A couple of years ago I was working on a KPI dashboard project where we had to display a bunch of KPIs produced by counting (distinct count) number of customers, accounts, etc. Even with SSAS 2008 we couldn’t much to optimize the queries to render the page in a few seconds because we found that 50% of the execution time was spent in the storage engine. We flirted with the idea of using solid state disks (SSD) but back then there were not that popular.
A recent feedback from other MVPs and members of the SSAS team suggests that in general SSD are favorable for optimizing the SSAS I/O performance. As you would imagine, the more time the Storage Engine (SE) spends in reading data from disk, the more performance improvement you would expect by switching to faster disks. But then the question becomes how much time SSAS really spends reading data from disk. As it turns out, the SQL Profiler doesn’t give you the answer. That’s because the Started/Finished reading data from the partition events include also the time spent in aggregating data and this time may be significant especially in the case of parent-child or many-to-many dimensions. So, judging from the SQL Profiler alone, you may think that most of the query time is spent in I/O where faster disks may help while it may turn out that you may need more CPU power.
Since as it stands the SQL Server Profiler doesn’t break down the SE time, you need to rely on Windows performance counters to find how much time was spent in actual I/O. Event Tracing for Windows (ETW) can give you such information. For example, on Windows 2008 and Windows 7 you can use the Xperf tool from the Windows Performance Toolkit. The following resources should get you started with Xperf:
As you will find out, the information emitted by XPerf could be overwhelming to answer a simple question. I posted a feedback on connect for a future release of SSAS to include more detailed tracing about the SE inner workings. This information should be available in SE so it shouldn’t be that difficult to break down the Progress Begin/End reports so customers know if they should scale up in terms of CPU or I/O. Please vote for it if you find it useful.