<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Implementing Qlik-style Variables in DAX	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://prologika.com/implementing-qlik-style-variables-in-dax/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://prologika.com/implementing-qlik-style-variables-in-dax/</link>
	<description>Business Intelligence Consulting and Training in Atlanta</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2017 01:45:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Prologika		</title>
		<link>https://prologika.com/implementing-qlik-style-variables-in-dax/#comment-273</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Prologika]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2017 01:45:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://prologika.com/?p=4247#comment-273</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://prologika.com/implementing-qlik-style-variables-in-dax/#comment-272&quot;&gt;Frank Tonsen&lt;/a&gt;.

Yes, you&#039;re right. I got confused with MD calculated members which do inherit format settings from base calculations. There isn&#039;t currently a good workaround for different formats, or at least until DAX supports expression-based format settings.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://prologika.com/implementing-qlik-style-variables-in-dax/#comment-272">Frank Tonsen</a>.</p>
<p>Yes, you&#8217;re right. I got confused with MD calculated members which do inherit format settings from base calculations. There isn&#8217;t currently a good workaround for different formats, or at least until DAX supports expression-based format settings.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Frank Tonsen		</title>
		<link>https://prologika.com/implementing-qlik-style-variables-in-dax/#comment-272</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Frank Tonsen]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Feb 2017 13:20:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://prologika.com/?p=4247#comment-272</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://prologika.com/implementing-qlik-style-variables-in-dax/#comment-271&quot;&gt;Prologika&lt;/a&gt;.

Teo,
of course I can format existing measures any way I want. But SelectedMeasure will always return its own format. Thus, it is for instance not possible to mix ratios and amounts. Using the DAX FORMAT function is another nice attempt, but because it returns text, your &#039;numbers&#039; will not align in tables/matrixes. Yes, you cannot even align text the way you want, neither in a column nor on an axes.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://prologika.com/implementing-qlik-style-variables-in-dax/#comment-271">Prologika</a>.</p>
<p>Teo,<br />
of course I can format existing measures any way I want. But SelectedMeasure will always return its own format. Thus, it is for instance not possible to mix ratios and amounts. Using the DAX FORMAT function is another nice attempt, but because it returns text, your &#8216;numbers&#8217; will not align in tables/matrixes. Yes, you cannot even align text the way you want, neither in a column nor on an axes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Prologika		</title>
		<link>https://prologika.com/implementing-qlik-style-variables-in-dax/#comment-271</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Prologika]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Feb 2017 12:43:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://prologika.com/?p=4247#comment-271</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://prologika.com/implementing-qlik-style-variables-in-dax/#comment-270&quot;&gt;Frank Tonsen&lt;/a&gt;.

Frank,
Instead of formulas, you can reference existing measures which you can format any way you want. Or, you can use the DAX FORMAT function to format the results of the formulas.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://prologika.com/implementing-qlik-style-variables-in-dax/#comment-270">Frank Tonsen</a>.</p>
<p>Frank,<br />
Instead of formulas, you can reference existing measures which you can format any way you want. Or, you can use the DAX FORMAT function to format the results of the formulas.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Frank Tonsen		</title>
		<link>https://prologika.com/implementing-qlik-style-variables-in-dax/#comment-270</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Frank Tonsen]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Feb 2017 12:01:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://prologika.com/?p=4247#comment-270</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Nice attempt, but it doesn&#039;t really help, because you have only one format for all your measures.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice attempt, but it doesn&#8217;t really help, because you have only one format for all your measures.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
