<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Overwriting Power BI Filters	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://prologika.com/overwriting-power-bi-filters/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://prologika.com/overwriting-power-bi-filters/</link>
	<description>Business Intelligence Consulting and Training in Atlanta</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 25 Jul 2021 14:53:15 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.1.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Dariusz Spiewak		</title>
		<link>https://prologika.com/overwriting-power-bi-filters/#comment-816</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dariusz Spiewak]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 Jul 2021 14:53:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://prologika.com/?p=5329#comment-816</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[The fact is that page- and report-level filters should never get overwritten in the way that&#039;s proposed in the article. That&#039;s because it&#039;s a hack and goes against Best Practices (it can create many problems down the way). It&#039;s much better to use the right filter granularity for the visuals in question and/or hidden filters/buttons with bookmarks or calculation groups.

But I do appreciate it&#039;s an article from 2018...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The fact is that page- and report-level filters should never get overwritten in the way that&#8217;s proposed in the article. That&#8217;s because it&#8217;s a hack and goes against Best Practices (it can create many problems down the way). It&#8217;s much better to use the right filter granularity for the visuals in question and/or hidden filters/buttons with bookmarks or calculation groups.</p>
<p>But I do appreciate it&#8217;s an article from 2018&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
