<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Transmissions from TechEd USA 2009 (Day 2)	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://prologika.com/transmissions-from-teched-usa-2009-day-2/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://prologika.com/transmissions-from-teched-usa-2009-day-2/</link>
	<description>Business Intelligence Consulting and Training in Atlanta</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 17 Feb 2016 10:10:10 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: samsonfr		</title>
		<link>https://prologika.com/transmissions-from-teched-usa-2009-day-2/#comment-117</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[samsonfr]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 May 2009 13:26:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/CS/blogs/blog/archive/2009/05/13/transmissions-from-teched-usa-2009-day-2.aspx#comment-117</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[For us, SSRS 2005 was a no go. The Tablix control along with the Dundas Charts were the main reasons we started using SSRS 2008.
Thanks for the TechEd coverage!]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For us, SSRS 2005 was a no go. The Tablix control along with the Dundas Charts were the main reasons we started using SSRS 2008.<br />
Thanks for the TechEd coverage!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: tlachev		</title>
		<link>https://prologika.com/transmissions-from-teched-usa-2009-day-2/#comment-116</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[tlachev]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 May 2009 18:15:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/CS/blogs/blog/archive/2009/05/13/transmissions-from-teched-usa-2009-day-2.aspx#comment-116</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Thank you. So, your reasons to move to SSRS 2008 align well with Microsoft as they ranked them this way. For me, lifting the crosstab limitations with tablix is #1. No more InScope hacks.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you. So, your reasons to move to SSRS 2008 align well with Microsoft as they ranked them this way. For me, lifting the crosstab limitations with tablix is #1. No more InScope hacks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Lou Paine		</title>
		<link>https://prologika.com/transmissions-from-teched-usa-2009-day-2/#comment-115</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Lou Paine]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 May 2009 17:07:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/CS/blogs/blog/archive/2009/05/13/transmissions-from-teched-usa-2009-day-2.aspx#comment-115</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Our #1 reason to move to SSRS 2008 (immediately upon release) was the rendering engine redesign. No more IIS resetting on it&#039;s own !  RB 2.0 was 2nd since RB 1 was far too feature poor for our end users and VS 2005 was far to complicated. RB 2.0 became an instant hit even with VS saavy folks. But a close 3rd is Tablix... There are at least 3 copies of your book around here btw... Reference book of choice... Thank you.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Our #1 reason to move to SSRS 2008 (immediately upon release) was the rendering engine redesign. No more IIS resetting on it&#8217;s own !  RB 2.0 was 2nd since RB 1 was far too feature poor for our end users and VS 2005 was far to complicated. RB 2.0 became an instant hit even with VS saavy folks. But a close 3rd is Tablix&#8230; There are at least 3 copies of your book around here btw&#8230; Reference book of choice&#8230; Thank you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
