Transmissions from TechEd USA 2009 (Day 4)

I got the final evaluation results from my session. Out of some 15 Business Intelligence sessions, mine was the fourth most attended session with 169 people attending. Based on 35 evaluations submitted, it was ranked as the third most useful session with an average satisfaction score of 3.46 on the scale from 1 to 4. For someone who does presentations occasionally, I’m personally happy with the results. Thanks for all who attended and liked the session!

I took it easy today. I attended the Scott Ruble’s Microsoft Office Excel 2007 Charting and Advanced Visualizations session in the morning. This was purely Excel-based session with no BI included. It demonstrated different ways to present information effectively in Excel, such as with conditional formatting, bar charts, sparklines, etc. Next, I was in the Learning Center until lunch.

In the afternoon, I decided to do some sightseeing and take a tour since I’ve never been to LA. I saw Marina Del Ray, Santa Monica, Venice Beach, Beverly Hills, Sunset Strip, Hollywood (and the famous sign of course), Mann’s Chinese Theatre, and Farmer’s Market. Coming from Atlanta and knowing the Atlanta traffic, I have to admit that the LA traffic is no better. In Atlanta, the traffic is bad during peak hours. In LA, it seems it’s bad all the time. Movies and premieres make the situation even worse. There was a huge movie premiere at 7 PM in the Chinese Theater with celebrities arriving with limos. This jammed the entire area. There were at least two movies being shot in different parts of the cities. But the rest of tour was fun. LA is one of the few cities in the world where almost every building has a famous story behind it.

This concludes my TechEd USA 2009 chronicles. Tomorrow, I’ll have time only for a breakfast and packing my luggage. I’m catching an early flight as it would take me four hours to fly to Atlanta. With three hours time difference, I’ll be hopefully in Atlanta by 9 PM and at home by midnight.

Transmissions from TechEd USA 2009 (Day 3)

Today was a long day. I started by attending the Richard Tkachuk’s A First Look at Large-Scale Data Warehousing in Microsoft SQL Server Code Name “Madison”. Those of you familiar with Analysis Services would probably recognize the presenter’s name since Richard came from the Analysis Services team and maintains the website. He recently moved to the Madison team. Madison is a new product and it’s based on a product by DATAllegro which Microsoft acquired sometime ago. As the session name suggests, it’s all about large scale databases, such as those exceeding 1 terabyte of data. Now, this is enormous amount of data that not many companies will ever amass. I’ve been fortunate (or unfortunate) that I never had to deal with such data volumes. If you do, then you may want to take a look at Madison. It’s designed to maximize sequential querying of data by employing a shared-nothing architecture where each processor core is given dedicated resources, such as a table partition. A controller node orchestrates the query execution. For example, if a query spans several tables, the controller node parses the query to understand where the data is located. Then, it forwards the query to each computing node that handles the required resources. The computing nodes are clustered in a SQL Server 2008 fail-over cluster which runs on Windows Server 2008. The tool provides a management dashboard where the administrator can see the utilization of each computing node.

Next, I attended the Fifth Annual Power Hour session. As its name suggests, TechEd has been carrying out this session for the past five years. The session format was originally introduced by Bill Baker who’s not longer with Microsoft. If you ever attended one of these sessions, you know the format. Product managers from all BI teams (Ofice, SharePoint, PerformancePoint, and SQL Server) show bizarre demos and throw t-shirt and toys to everything that moves (OK, sits). The Office team showed an Excel Services demo where an Excel spreadsheet ranked popular comics characters. Not to be outdone, the PerformancePoint team showed a pixel-based image on Mona Lisa. Not sure what PerformancePoint capabilities this demonstrated since I don’t know PerformancePoint that well but it looked great.

The Reporting Services team showed a cool demo where the WinForms ReportViewer control would render a clickable map (the map control will debut in SQL Server 2008 R2) that re-assigns the number of Microsoft sales employees around the US states. For me, the coolest part of this demo was that there was no visible refresh when the map image is clicked although there was probably round tripping between the control and the server. Thierry D’Hers later on clued me in that there is some kind of buffering going on which I have to learn more about. This map control looks cool! Once I get my hands on it with some tweaking maybe I’ll be able to configure it as a heat map that is not geospatial.

Finally, Donald Farmer showed another Gemini demo which helped learn more about Gemini. I realized that 20 mil+ rows were compressed to 200 MB Excel file. However, the level of compression really depends on the data loaded in Excel. Specifically, it depends on the redundant values in each column. I learned that the in-memory model that is constructed in Excel is implemented as in-process DLL whose code was derived from the Analysis Services code base. The speed of the in-memory model is phenomenal! 20 mil rows sorted within a second on the Donald’s notebook (not even laptop, mind you). At this point Microsoft hasn’t decided yet how Gemini will be licensed and priced.

As usual, after lunch I decided to hang around in the BI learning center and help with questions. Then, it was a show time for my presentation! I don’t why but every TechEd I get one of these rooms that I feel intimidated just to look at them. How come Microsoft presenters who demo cooler stuff than mine, such as features in the next version, get smaller rooms and I get those monstrous rooms? It must be intentional; I have to ask the TechEd organizers. The room I got was next to the keynote hall and could easily accommodate 500-600 people, if not more. Two years ago, I actually had a record of 500+ people attending my session which was scheduled right after the keynote.

This year, the attendance was more modest. I don’t have the final count yet, but I think about 150+ folks attended my session so there was plenty of room to scale up. I think the presentation well very well. The preliminary evaluation reports confirm this. I demoed report authoring, management, and delivery tips sprinkled with real-life examples. We had some good time and I think everyone enjoyed the show.

It’s always good to know that your work is done. I look forward to enjoying the rest of TechED and LA.

Transmissions from TechEd USA 2009 (Day 2)

I started the day by attending the Donald Farmer and Daniel Yu’s session “Creating the Right Cubes for Microsoft Excel and Excel Services” hoping that I’ll get a sneak preview of Excel 2010. Alas, it was all about refining the cube definition with display folders, perspectives, hierarchies, etc. so it appears more user-friendly in Excel. Later, I learned that Office 2010 (or whatever it will be called) is under strict NDA which explains the lack of demos. The most interesting thing about that session was that I finally understood why the SSAS team decided to scale down the cube wizard in SSAS 2008 to generate basic dimensions only. The reason was performance. You see, the BIDS 2005 cube wizard would oftentimes suggest non-optimal dimension hierarchies and the modeler wouldn’t revise the design leading to bad performance.

Next, I attended the Thierry D’Hers Top Ten Reasons for Using Microsoft SQL Server 2008 Reporting Services. It’s always good to watch RS-related sessions. Thierry listed the community support as one of the reasons for organizations to consider moving to SSRS. I agree with this and the great community support is applicable to all MS technologies. Speaking about BI only, a few years ago there wasn’t a single book about Cognos for example. Granted, the last I look on Amazon there was one book. In comparison, Microsoft has a vibrant community of book authors, MVPs, trainers, etc. Almost every publisher has a book about SSRS 2008. This is of course good for the community and so good about authors as the competition is tough J

Thierry listed the Report Builder 2.0 as #1 reason to move to SSRS 2008, followed by data visualization, and tablix. Based on my real-life projects, I’d personally have listed them in the reverse order, with tablix being #1. This session officially announced that the map control will make to the Kilimanjaro release (now officially called SQL Server 2008 R2). Later on, Thierry was kind enough to show me a demo of the map pre-release bits. One of the data modes is using the SQL Server 2008 geospatial data types which would let you map any region in the world. Thierry showed a cool report showing the worldwide sales of SQL Server, where each country had a different color gradient based on the sales volume.

After lunch, I hang around the BI area in the learning center to answer questions and rub shoulders with Microsoft employees and peers. I was surprised to learn that there are only two Reporting Services-related sessions for the entire TechEd and one of them is mine! All of a sudden, I felt 2″ taller. Later on, I felt adventurous to learn something completely new and attended a SQL Server 2008 Failover Clustering only to realize how much I don’t know about it since I’ve never used it. BTW, there are great advancements in the SQL Server 2008 failover clustering, such as ability to upgrade or patch a cluster node without stopping it.

Transmissions from TechEd USA 2009 (Day 1)

Day 1 of TechEd 2009 is almost over with the exception of the Community Influencers Party tonight. I heard that this year they expect 7,000 attendees. This is a huge scale-down from previous years. For instance, we had 16,000 attendees at TechEd USA 2007. Economy is hitting everything hard.

I thought the keynote was kind of lame. Judging by it, Microsoft has only three products: Windows 7 (officially announced to ship around holidays although Microsoft didn’t say which holidays), Windows Server 2008 (the buzz is now the forthcoming R2 release), and Exchange Server 2010. Unlike previous TechEds, there wasn’t a single announcement about other products. SQL Server KJ, Office 2010, Azure, dev tools? Nope, apparently not worth mentioning. Sure Mark Russinovich, whom I respect very much, did some cool Windows 7 demos but there were not enough to pique my interest. I understand that OS and Exchange Server are bedrock for every business and after the sad Vista saga, we have to show the world that now we’ll do things right with Windows 7, but the BI soul in me was thirsty for more.

After lunch, I hang around the BI area of the Learning Center, where I answered questions and met with other peers, including Nick Barclay (MVP) whom I wanted to meet personally for a while. Then, I attended the excellent Donald Farmer and Kamal Hathi ‘s Microsoft Project Code Name “Gemini: Self Service Analysis and the Future of BI and I had the chance to see the Gemini, which I blogged briefly about before without knowing too much, for the first time in action and gain more in-depth knowledge.

The Gemini is an end-user oriented Excel add-in that will let the user acquire data from a variety of data sources, including SSRS reports (SSRS KJ will expose reports as data feeds) and SharePoint lists, and load them in an Excel spreadsheet. The tool crunches data very fast even on a modest computer (the demo showed a notebook computer working with millions of rows) thanks to its ability to compress column-level data. This works because a dataset column would typically contain redundant data.

Once data is loaded in Excel, the tool will attempt to automatically determine the relationships between datasets (loaded in separate spreadsheets) to create a hidden dimensional model consisting of fact and dimension in-memory tables. The user will be able to manually specify the dataset relationships by telling the tool which column will be used to join the datasets (very much like joining relational tables). Moreover, the user will be able to define calculated columns using Excel-style formulas. Finally, as the add-in builds behind the scenes an in-memory cube, the user will be able to slice and dice data in a Pivot table report. So, no Analysis Services is needed if all the user wants is manipulating data on the desktop.

Where things are getting more interesting is deploying the models on the server. To do so, the end user would deploy the Excel spreadsheet to the MOSS Report Library. Note that MOSS is required for server-side deployment. When other users request the spreadsheet, an Analysis Services redirector will understand that this is a Gemini model and service the requests from a server cube. At this point is not clear how exactly the server cube will be built and whether it could be managed in SSMS. Once the cube returns data, Excel Services will kick in to return data in HTML. A Reporting Services client can also connect to the server cube by its URL. This is no different than connection to a regular cube as Reporting Services will launch the familiar MDX query designer.

So, where is the IT in the new Gemini world? IT will use a cool MOSS dashboard to understand who’s deployed what model and how the models are used, such as when the datasets were refreshed, what are the most popular models, what resources these models took on the server, etc.

What’s my personal take on Gemini? It’s not up to me to decide how useful it is since it’s a business-oriented tool, such as Report Builder 2.0. Business users will have the final word. Based on my personal experience though, the data analytics problems that I need to solve with traditional Analysis Services cubes surpass the Gemini capabilities by far. So, don’t throw your MDX knowledge out of the door yet. In my line of work, I can see Gemini being useful as a cube prototyping tool, especially in the early stages of requirement gathering where data can be typed in Excel and I can demonstrate to users what a cube can do for them. Of course, Microsoft plans for Gemini are much more ambitious than that. In the ideal world, all business users would upgrade to Office 2010 and create cool Gemini models to give IT folks a long-deserved break ;-). Or, so the fairytale goes….

To wrap up the day, I attended What’s New in Microsoft SQL Data Services presentation by Rick Negrin to find out that SQL Data Services is nothing more than SQL Server running on Microsoft data centers. SQL Data Services will support two application connectivity modes: a “code near” mode where the application (typically a web application) is deployed to Azure and “code far”, where the application will connect to SQL Server over Internet using the TDS protocol. Microsoft role is to provide scalability and failover. Not all SQL Server features will be available in version 1. For example, CLR will not make the cut.

A long and tiring day. I am off to the party now.