My book is shipping on Amazon
My book is shipping on Amazon.com. It is also available on Barnes & Noble.
Hurry up until supplies last 🙂
My book is shipping on Amazon.com. It is also available on Barnes & Noble.
Hurry up until supplies last 🙂
One of the limitations of RS version 1.0 is that it doesn’t allow you set the connnection string (a.k.a. data source) during runtime. For example, you may need to support separate databases per client and based on the logged on client you may need to redirect the user to the appropriate database.
To address this issue, Toby Riley developed an interesting dynamic query data extension which allows you to pass the connection string as a report parameter. If you don’t want to pass the connection string as a parameter, you should be able easily to retrofit the code to read the connection string from a configuration file. For more information how this could be done read my posting at http://tinyurl.com/3tcpj.
Toby’s extension is buit upon mine ADO.NET custom dataset data extension. You can download and give the Dynamic Query Data Extension a spin at http://workspaces.gotdotnet.com/appworld.
My custom ADO.NET dataset extension can be downloaded from http://www.gotdotnet.com/Community/UserSamples/Details.aspx?SampleGuid=B8468707-56EF-4864-AC51-D83FC3273FE5.
Judging by the questions post on the RS newsgroup, many developers are often confused about which implementation choice will best meet their integration requirements. I hope the following comparison will help you evaluate them:
URL addressability (HTTP-GET)
· Implementation–The report request is submitted on the client side of the application directly to the Report Server. For Internet reporting, the Report Server has to be accessible on Internet.
· Functionality–Limited to requesting reports only.
· Interactive features (drilldown, drill-through, etc.)–Yes
· HTML Viewer toolbar–Available
· Integration effort–Easy, especially if the HTML Viewer meets your reporting requirements. For example, you can hardcode the report URL address in a hyperlink.
· Security–Windows-based (intranet reporting) or Form Authentication (Internet reporting)
· Vulnerability– A malicious user can see and exploit the report request
· Flexibility–Less flexible
· Performance—Better than RS Web service
RS Web Service (SOAP)
· Implementation– With web-based applications the report request is typically submitted on the server side of the application.
· Functionality–Exposes all RS functionality, including requesting reports, managing the report catalog, subscribed delivery, etc.
· Interactive features (drilldown, drill-through, etc.)–No
· HTML Viewer toolbar—Not available
· Integration effort– More involved. You need to take care of downloading the report images explicitly, handling report parameters, and rendering the report to the end user.
· Security– Typically Windows-based authentication
· Vulnerability– More secured, since the report is generated entirely on the server side.
· Flexibility– Flexible integration scenarios, e.g. reporting off ADO.NET datasets, evaluating business rules, unattended report generation, etc.
· Performance– The report payload needs to be serialized on the server-side to a byte array and de-serialized on the client side.
Recently I had to migrate a Report Server installation from one server to another by keeping the Report Server catalog intact. If you find yourself in the same situation, here are the steps (hope I recall them right ): rskeymgmt -e -fa:\keys.txt -p<password>, where password is any password you want to use to secure the encryption keys. You will need it later to restore the encryption keys on the new installation. For more info about the encryption keys, read Bryan Keller’s posting (http://blogs.msdn.com/bryanke/archive/2004/03/18/92102.aspx). resconfig.exe –c –s That’s it.. and don’t forget to store the encryption keys file in a save place.
rskeymgmt -a –f
Many of you probably know that one of the Microsoft RS partners, Cizer, offers an ad-hoc reporting tool called Cizer Query (mentioned in my book).
Now, Cizer has released a report designer tool – Cizer Report Builder, as an alternative for authoring reports if you don’t have or want to purchase VS.NET. According to the vendor:
“Cizer Report Builder (CRB) 2004 v1.00 is now available. Bringing full-featured production report design into the browser, CRB makes the rapid deployment of reporting with Microsoft Reporting Services a reality. Cizer .NET Reporting now provides both ad hoc and production report design in a single web interface with zero client installation or download required. Charts, graphs, parameters, images, calculations and formatting are now easy to develop and manage. Other highlights include:
Guided Report Development Wizards
Links to Cizer Quick Query
Access to Multiple Data Sources
Drag and Drop Placement of Report Objects
Local and Global Libraries for Report Templates, Queries and Parameter Panels
Private and Public Report Sharing
Saves as RDL Format Which Easily Exports to Multiple Formats Including Excel and PDF
Deploys to Microsoft Reporting Services to Support Enterprise-Wide Distribution
Cizer Report Builder is available for purchase on the Cizer website (www.cizer.com). “
Please let me know if you like Cizer Report Builder. Do you think that it provides a viable alternative to the RS Report Designer?
My book “Reporting Services in Action” is finally available in print format. For time being, it can be purchased only from the publisher’s website (http://www.manning.com/lachev). It will probably take a couple of weeks before the book reaches other outlets such as Amazon.com.
Many thanks to those of you that will purchase my book. I sincerely hope you will find it as much fun to read as it was to write. I am always interested to know my product meet your needs. Please drop me a line to let me know what you liked or disliked about my book.
Happy reporting with Microsoft Reporting Services in Action!
For those of you who would like to know what new RS features have made it to SQL Server 2005 Beta 2, here is the list:
The rest of the RS new features will be included in SQL Server Beta 3 scheduled to be released around Q2 2005.
I highly recommend you start evaluating SQL Server 2005 as soon as you can. There are so many new and cool features that it may take you months to go over them. On the downside, you need a beefed up testing machine. Based on my experience, the Beta 2 performance is far from being optimized. Loading the Books Online, Management and Intelligence Studio pretty much take up all of the 700 MB of RAM allocated to my Virtual PC. Ouch!
If you need community support, check out the SQL Server 2005 newsgroups at http://communities.microsoft.com/newsgroups/default.asp?icp=sqlserver2005 .
Happy yukoning!
Well, I have to admit that I will miss the echo of the drums and buzz surrounding TechEd Europe 2004. There are many new and exciting things coming for developers next year which means a lot of reading too J
My favorite session (besides DAT354 which I presented of course) was Scott Guthrie’s one about the next generation of ASP.NET 2.0. I enjoyed also the Tim Sneath’s session. SQL Server 2005 integration with .NET is cool although I have to admit that I was a bit disappointed that it supports only external .NET assemblies that have to pre-registered in similar way that RS integrates with .NET assemblies. Why can I write the whole darn thing in managed code? Hopefully the next SQL Server incarnation will finally kiss T-SQL good bye … Another sad thing was that .NET 2.0 Enterprise Services still require COM+ interop. COM dies hard…
The buzz surrounding Reporting Services was impressing too. The RS sessions were the ones most attended and looks like many of you are planning to give Reporting Services a spin and/or bring it to the max. Stay tuned; many good things are happening in the RS 2005 including the next generation of WinForm and ASP.NET controls…
I enclose download links to my presentation and source code for those of you who missed the event.